Showing posts with label quality of life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quality of life. Show all posts
08 June, 2010
Twenty-Five Thumbs Up!
Yesterday was actually quite a special day as we have another group of visitors from Fairchild TV, Ms Audrea Chan and cameraman Mr Koo who visited the Home Care Unit in the afternoon.
The interview this time is rather different than those in the past as it's more focus on how to live the end-stage-of-life, especially on how my family is coping with the situation, how to live with the disease and how to improve the quality of life. While Esther is having the interview with Audrea, and me as the background. Funny enough, I am so glad that this time around, I am just sitting at the background and I took advantage of the time to do the Blogger posting for today, i.e. this posting. We also did a shot while Esther would need to carry a cup to my bed side for me. Not sure about how the end product would look like, but I am glad that Esther is now part of the total picture (as with her presence then the picture is now complete). The interview this time is focusing more on "quality of life" and to encourage "open communication" so the family can also face the process with ease. As you can imagine, my role is so simple as I am the one being taken care of, while Esther's role is much more difficult as she is the one who is taking care of me in additional to other daily routines. Our family now promotes and is working towards "normalization". Esther has returned to work, though part-time (and thank you to her boss' accommodation and understanding), and I am learning and achieving how to take care of myself in most daily tasks. I like what Esther said today, "We are learning everyday!" and with this attitude we are able to achieve small improvement day by day and our quality of life is also improving on a daily basis.
This interview will be broadcast this coming Wednesday (9/June) inside the Community News program (7:00pm to 8:00pm in Vancouver). It will also be repeated at111:00pm same evening. We hope you can find time to enjoy this possibly 3 minutes long interview.
To make this happen, thank you Audrea, thank you Koo, thank you Eileen, and most important of all, thank you Esther, thank you for your love, care, and everything that you have given me! Thank you!
Labels:
Audrea Chan,
Community News,
end-stage-of-life,
Fairchild TV,
Koo,
quality of life
15 May, 2010
A Better Way of Dying?
The weather this week is so so beautiful which I don't think anyone would have the slightest complaint. It's only that due to skin rash, I am advised not to go out during mid day to avoid the exposure to UV lights which I am more than happy to adhere to. The air in the morning is very fresh. It's so fresh that as soon as you inhale, you actually feel the oxygen inside your lung was transferring to your other body parts through the blood stream. I am not exaggerating and you have to go out and try it for yourself. Yes, go out and try it for yourself!
Today is Saturday (weekend) and I am not sure if it's a good idea to talk about this serious topic. I borrowed a book from the local library called "A Better Way of Dying" and subtitled as "How to make the best choices at the end of the life". This book is written by two sisters, one is a lawyer (Eileen Fitzpatrick) and the other one is a medical doctor (Jeanne Fitzpatrick).
The book's subject is about the Contract of Compassionate Care. It lets you choose what medical treatment you want or don't want at the end of your life. It gives you the option to choose a natural death. The authors placed high emphasis on the communication process and believes that Compassion Protocol opens a dialogue between you and your family, friends and health care professionals regarding your end-of-life care. Keep in mind, this dialogue is usually absent in our society, or more accurately rephrased that it is purposely avoided.
"The option to choose a natural death" is a controversial topic. It involves debate of various legal, social, ethical and religious issues. In early March, when I showed the MRI report of my spine and skeletal bones to an Oncologist, seeking his second opinion. He came back with a short email "Your report is not good and I suggest you immediately prepare your personal matters, e.g. your will." Hahahah! I was expecting a second opinion in how to go forward, and rather than dealing with medical issues, it seems to me he believes legal issues are more important and this leads me to believe that my (biological) situation must be pretty bad! Then, I find an appropriate time to talk to Esther (and later with Leo) regarding my will. I told them if at any point of time (in future) that I am so sick that I am unconscious and need to rely on medical instruments to prolong my existence but gain no quality of life, they would have to allow me to leave and instruct the medical professionals to stop using all those medical instruments. I also make them understand that it is MY decision, and not their decision, and they should have no emotional burden as they simply follow my instruction to act accordingly. I also informed them regarding the donation of my body organs.
Indeed I have seen a few struggles by families when their Loved ones were dying and fell unconscious. The picture is so sad that you see tubes and medical instruments are attached everywhere to an unconscious human body which lacks the ability to provide you with a normal feedback, e.g. a blink of the eye. Often, a simple cough, or a bad facial expression, brings anxiety and gives their family and friends the wrong impression that he/she must be suffering in their dying bed. A lot of scientific journals would argue that although a person fall unconscious, their six senses actually still working! Anyway, I am more looking at "quality of life" and if the prolonged period of stay is a torture to my family and friends, and especially to my Loved Ones, then I prefer to cut this suffering short and keep it a pretty process. As you all would agree, it's not the length that it matters, it's the quality that matters!
Today is Saturday (weekend) and I am not sure if it's a good idea to talk about this serious topic. I borrowed a book from the local library called "A Better Way of Dying" and subtitled as "How to make the best choices at the end of the life". This book is written by two sisters, one is a lawyer (Eileen Fitzpatrick) and the other one is a medical doctor (Jeanne Fitzpatrick).
The book's subject is about the Contract of Compassionate Care. It lets you choose what medical treatment you want or don't want at the end of your life. It gives you the option to choose a natural death. The authors placed high emphasis on the communication process and believes that Compassion Protocol opens a dialogue between you and your family, friends and health care professionals regarding your end-of-life care. Keep in mind, this dialogue is usually absent in our society, or more accurately rephrased that it is purposely avoided.
"The option to choose a natural death" is a controversial topic. It involves debate of various legal, social, ethical and religious issues. In early March, when I showed the MRI report of my spine and skeletal bones to an Oncologist, seeking his second opinion. He came back with a short email "Your report is not good and I suggest you immediately prepare your personal matters, e.g. your will." Hahahah! I was expecting a second opinion in how to go forward, and rather than dealing with medical issues, it seems to me he believes legal issues are more important and this leads me to believe that my (biological) situation must be pretty bad! Then, I find an appropriate time to talk to Esther (and later with Leo) regarding my will. I told them if at any point of time (in future) that I am so sick that I am unconscious and need to rely on medical instruments to prolong my existence but gain no quality of life, they would have to allow me to leave and instruct the medical professionals to stop using all those medical instruments. I also make them understand that it is MY decision, and not their decision, and they should have no emotional burden as they simply follow my instruction to act accordingly. I also informed them regarding the donation of my body organs.
Indeed I have seen a few struggles by families when their Loved ones were dying and fell unconscious. The picture is so sad that you see tubes and medical instruments are attached everywhere to an unconscious human body which lacks the ability to provide you with a normal feedback, e.g. a blink of the eye. Often, a simple cough, or a bad facial expression, brings anxiety and gives their family and friends the wrong impression that he/she must be suffering in their dying bed. A lot of scientific journals would argue that although a person fall unconscious, their six senses actually still working! Anyway, I am more looking at "quality of life" and if the prolonged period of stay is a torture to my family and friends, and especially to my Loved Ones, then I prefer to cut this suffering short and keep it a pretty process. As you all would agree, it's not the length that it matters, it's the quality that matters!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

